Personal Injury Lawyers Be Warned about the Content of Affidavits

May 23rd, 2013

An application to adduce fresh evidence in an appeal of a successful personal injury jury award was thwarted by a deficient affidavit from a legal support staff. This million dollar personal injury award case arising out of a car accident injury (Albert v. Politano, 2013 BCCA 194) deserves more than one article as personal injury lawyers will also be interested in how the court dealt with the future loss of earnings award appeal.

As most lawyers experienced in personal injury know Rule 22-2(13) of the Supreme Court Civil Rules governs the content of affidavits: (13)  An affidavit may contain statements as to the information and belief of the person swearing or affirming the affidavit, if (a) the source of the information and belief is given, and (b) the affidavit is made (i) in respect of an application that does not seek a final order …

The affidavit of the legal assistant did  not identify the source of the information and did not attest to her belief in it and was found to be inadmissible. This was more than a  technical deficiency; by failing to reveal the source, the reliability of the information is put beyond the reach of the opposing personal injury lawyers . Any cross-examination on the affidavit, by definition, would not be of the best source of the information.

Simply put at paragraph 25 by Judge Saunders,  ”…where a final order is sought to be upset, the best evidence is the standard that must be met. We have not been provided with that best evidence.” The fresh evidence application was dismissed.

Posted by Personal Injury Lawyer Mr. Renn A. Holness, B.A. LL.B.

List of Top Personal Injury Lawyer Case Quotes In BC

May 17th, 2013

An index for Personal injury lawyers and counsel generally is provided by the  registry with a list of cases so commonly referred to and accepted in British Columbia that  lawyers need only index them in the case brief . In the typical car accident claim however lawyers exchange a  table of case authorities and the best sections of the each case are referred to in the course of argument.

Personal injury lawyers usually checklist the existence of a legal duty,  a breach of a standard of care and resulting loss injury or damage in any injury case and prepare a legal brief referencing the top relevant case authorities. Here are three of the more notable references I think all personal injury lawyers in BC should have in their back pockets when going to court:

1. “[a] future or hypothetical possibility will be taken into consideration as long as it is a real and substantial possibility and not mere speculation”Judge Major- Athey v. Leonati, [1996] 3 S.C.R. 458 at para. 27;

2. “[t]he general, but not conclusive, test for causation is the ‘but for’ test, which requires the plaintiff to show that the injury would not have occurred but for the negligence of the defendant” Judge Major- Athey v. Leonati, at para. 14; and

3. “the amount of an award for non-pecuniary damage[ pain and suffering] should not depend alone upon the seriousness of the injury but upon its ability to ameliorate the condition of the victim considering his or her particular situation.”  Cooper-Stephenson and Saunders, Personal Injury Damages in Canada (1981), at p. 373 quotes by Judge Kirkpatrick in Stapley v. Hejslet 2006 BCCA 34

There are many other legendary quotes that could be added to the list most of which  top-rate lawyers practicing personal injury will want to have and update frequently.

Posted by Personal Injury Lawyer Mr. Renn A. Holness, B.A. LL.B.

Lawyer in Vancouver for ICBC Claim

May 10th, 2013

Finding the best lawyer in Vancouver for a claim with the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia depends on the type of case you have and the qualities you consider to be important. There are over 10,0000 lawyers in BC, most of them having offices in Vancouver. Not all ICBC claims require a lawyer and most lawyers will agree to take your case on a percentage type fee arrangement if there is a claim for personal  loss and damage that can be settled.

Here are few  good tips to consider when looking for a lawyer:

1. Make sure the lawyer is able to practice law in British Columbia;

2. Find out whether the lawyer or law firm works for ICBC on other claims; and

3. Meet the lawyer in his or her office in Vancouver to ensure they provide the legal services you need for your claim.

Watch my short video about  your ICBC claim and spend some time at our site as I have written numerous articles to help people find the right lawyer in Vancouver for an ICBC claim.

Posted by Renn A. Holness, B.A. LL.B.

ICBC Injury Claim Settlements for Pain and Suffering

April 18th, 2013

 

As a personal injury lawyer in BC since 1995 I’m often asked  how to settle whiplash back injury and soft tissue injury claims with ICBC and how much a case is really worth. Rear end car accidents tend to be the number one culprit and ICBC has standard procedures for insurance adjusters to follow before payments such as settlement amounts can be offered and paid out. It is ultimately however a Judge that may  decide the value of your case so understanding what you need to prove can help in settlement negotiations.

If you have suffered loss due to a personal injury you will understand that some losses are out of pocket, like cost of treatment, and can be calculated, and other losses are difficulty or impossible to calculate, such as loss of enjoyment. This article addresses the Supreme Court of BC legal criterion for a personal injury awards for pain and suffering and loss of enjoyment of life. Here is a non-exhaustive list to consider when trying to settle an injury claim or responding to an offer, including whiplash and soft tissue injury, with the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia and other insurance companies:

(a) age of the injury claimant;(b) Type of the injury;(c) Severity and duration of pain;(d) Disability;(e) Emotional suffering;  (f) Loss or impairment of life;(g) Impairment of family, marital and social relationships;(h) Impairment of physical and mental abilities; (i) Loss of lifestyle; and (j) The claimant’s stoicism.

In British Columbia if your injury is so trivial as to be de minimus you will be awarded nothing for your injury. Yes, zero dollars.  In this type of case ICBC will often refuse to make any offer of settlement and may even refuse to pay for injury related out of pocket expenses such as massage and physiotherapy.

If an injury claimant has suffered a catastrophic injury the maximum cap in Canada for pain and suffering set by the Supreme Court of Canada is currently under $400,000.00

It is important to understand that injury claims are usually composed of more than a claim for pain and suffering. Get a legal consult to determine whether legal guidelines may entitle you to compensation for more than just pain and suffering. Settling your case without a lawyer is something many live to regret. Watch my short video about whether to settle your injury claim with ICBC.

Posted by Personal Injury Lawyer Mr. Renn A. Holness, B.A. LL.B.

Best Outcome for Medical Malpractice Lawyers in Supreme Court of Canada

April 12th, 2013

 

A $3.2 million personal injury award has been restored by our top court,the Supreme Court of Canada, helping to reinforce our modern approach to legal causation  in medical malpractice cases(Ediger v. Johnston, 2013 SCC 18) and personal injury cases generally. Personal injury lawyers assisting the injured will applaud the clarity and brevity of this decision. 

This win has given a British Columbia family the ability to care for their severely disabled child as the $3,224,000 damage award is sent back to the Court of Appeal for further consideration. Tragically, as result of sustained bradycardia from a negligent caesarean section delivery, the infant litigant suffered severe and permanent brain damage.  She lives her life with spastic quadriplegia and cerebral palsy.  She is non-verbal, tube-fed, confined to a wheel chair and totally dependent on others for all of her daily needs.  Her life expectancy is 38 years. 

The sole issue was whether the doctor’s  breaches of the standard of care caused the infant’s injury. A lawsuit for negligence in Canada requires proof of a duty of care, breach of the standard of care, compensable damage, and causation. The court  can draw an inference against a doctor who does not introduce sufficient evidence contrary to that which supports the injury claimant’s theory of causation.  In determining whether the doctor has introduced sufficient evidence, the court should take into account the relative position of each party to adduce evidence. 

Here is a great summary of our current test for legal causation in civil cases, straight from the Supreme Court of Canada, 

A.        The Legal Test for Causation 

[28]    This Court recently summarized the legal test for causation in Clements v. Clements, 2012 SCC 32, [2012] 2 S.C.R. 181.  Causation is assessed using the “but for” test:  Clements, at paras. 8 and 13; Resurfice Corp. v. Hanke, 2007 SCC 7, [2007] 1 S.C.R. 333, at paras. 21-22. That is, the plaintiff must show on a balance of probabilities that “but for” the defendant’s negligent act, the injury would not have occurred: Clements, at para. 8.  “Inherent in the phrase ‘but for’ is the requirement that the defendant’s negligence was necessary to bring about the injury — in other words that the injury would not have occurred without the defendant’s negligence”  (ibid. (emphasis deleted)).  

[29]    Causation is a factual inquiry (Clements, at paras. 8 and 13).  Accordingly, the trial judge’s causation finding is reviewed for palpable and overriding error (H.L. v. Canada (Attorney General), 2005 SCC 25, [2005] 1 S.C.R. 401, at paras. 53-56).  

Truly one of the finest, first rate decisions in recent memory and a must read for lawyers. Watch my short video about proving medical malpractice cases. Posted by Personal Injury Lawyer Mr. Renn A. Holness, B.A. LL.B. 

 

Free Legal Advice Before Speaking with ICBC

February 13th, 2013

As a personal injury lawyer in Vancouver since 1995 I have always been open to providing a free initial consultation for people dealing with ICBC following a car crash . Getting no fee lawyer advice can be a lifeline and true asset at the beginning of an ICBC claim, just after the car accident.

Hiring an experienced lawyer for a personal injury is however not free and will require a claimant to sign a contract for fees, often referred to as a retainer agreement. The good news is that  personal injury lawyers in British Columbia are permitted to take cases on a percentage arrangement and can fund the prosecution of the cases. Claimants that get this arrangement can walk out of the initial meeting with the lawyer having hired the lawyer without paying any up front fees.

As in any free professional commodity such as healthcare, education or financial management this advice will be limited by the lack of resources required to provide the service, hence why lawyers have to be paid for the professional advice they give to clients. “A Lawyer’s time and advice are his/her stock in trade”- Abrahan Lincoln.

There are time limits to report a car crash to ICBC but it is important to make time to call a lawyer before giving ICBC a statement or before signing documents for the insurance adjuster. What documents you should sign for ICBC or what forms must be signed by you will depend on the type of claim you have. How to make an ICBC claim for damage to a vehicle is different than making a personal injury claim. Remember that the free advice you get at the beginning of a injury case will be of limited benefit as the case moves forward. 

Posted by  Mr. Renn A. Holness, B.A. LL.B.

ICBC Personal Injury Settlements- A Compensation Summary

December 30th, 2012

 

Before resolution, personal injury claims in British Columbia are usually filed in the Supreme Court of British Columbia. Cases that are worth less than $25,000.00 should be filed in the Provincial Court. If a case is worth less than $100,000 the Fast Track Litigation rules will apply and legal costs will be limited by the Court Rules. There are exceptions which can be agreed to between the parties to the lawsuit or ordered by the Court.

Money for pain and suffering was capped at $100,000.00 by the Supreme Court of Canada. Since this decision in 1971 the consumer price index has caused the maximum amount to increase to over $350,000.00. This amount is reserved for the most catastrophically injured and usually requires more than whiplash injury. Settlement amount must also include compensation for loss of earning capacity, cost of care, and many other claims which may bring the severe cases into the millions of dollars. There is no cap on the amount a person can be awarded by the Supreme Court.

There are however policy limits for ICBC insured, which start at a minimum of $200,000.00.  If the at fault driver only has the minimum coverage the claimant may have Underinsured Motorist Protection (UMP). This is required insurance for all BC driver’s and provides for $1 million compensation coverage, subject to deductions. If the injury claimant purchased excess UMP this will give the claimant to up $2 million in coverage, subject to deductions.

The best tips and guidelines for a personal injury settlements with ICBC come from personal injury lawyers practising within British Columbia. It is hard for me to imagine, as a personal injury lawyer, a claimant going through a negotiation with ICBC without a lawyer and ending up with a fair settlement. I get calls from claimants that have settled there cases without a lawyer and want to get out of the deal. Unfortunately it is usually too late and too costly.

Important to note that ICBC whiplash compensation amounts are NOT set by the Insurance Corporation of BC. Judges in British Columbia are given the responsibility of assessing personal injury cases and determining the proper compensation. Average payouts that may be sited elsewhere are simply wrong. ICBC may offer $10,000 or $15,000.00 to settle case worth much more than that. Conversely, injury claimants without lawyers may demand amounts far out of reality.

There are no average payouts and no meat charts like the one used for WCB. When trying to resolve a personal injury claim, money for pain and suffering will often depend on the age of the claimant, nature of the injury, severity and duration of pain, disability, emotional suffering and loss or impairment of life. Whether a judge awards $25,000.00, $50,000.00 or $75, 000.00 will often depend of these factors along with other factors such as impaired relationships, impairment of physical and mental abilities, loss of lifestyle, and the claimant’s stoic attitude. Read my article about whiplash injury compensation from ICBC.

Lastly, watch my video about ICBC settlement compensation and remember that when you settle with ICBC your are often settling your claim for accident benefits as well as your claim of negligence against the other driver. Getting a free legal consultation before settling a case is therefore without a doubt the right thing to do. Contact me at helpwithICBC@gmail.com for legal advice for your injury claim.

Posted by Mr. Renn A. Holness, B.A., LL.B.

Car Accident Injury With no Impact- Making an ICBC Injury Claim

December 24th, 2012

 

The truth is, personal injury claimants are permitted to pursue negligence claims despite the contact between vehicles. This also applies in British Columbia for accident benefits from ICBC, the Insurance corporation of British Columbia and a personal injury lawyer will be able to tell you about all the reporting requirements. Pedestrians are included in this principle and pedestrians that get hurt  are entitled to compensation, despite the lack of damage to the vehicle.  Check out my short video about ICBC injury claims with no vehicular contact.

As a personal injury lawyer in Vancouver I have talked to and represented many people that have been injured in motor vehicle accidents in which the cars do not come into contact. The force of braking or swerving may be enough to cause musculoskeletal injury, depending on a persons pre-exising condition. Read my article about a money award for car accident injury with no collison.

Importantly, one specific exception are Hit and Run accidents that occur outside of British Columbia. The law says, in short, that there must be proof of contact between the vehicles  if you are claiming injury from a hit and run outside BC. It can be key therefore to get a lawyer experienced in ICBC claims involved if you are injured in a hit and run.

Whether you are a pedestrian, motorist, cyclist, or other user of our roadways the key ingredient to making a negligence claim is connecting, through legal causation,  the negligent conduct of the offending driver with the injury that is alleged. Most up to date and qualified ICBC injury lawyers in British Columbia can be very helpful in proving legal cause in civil car accident cases.

Posted by Personal Injury Lawyer Mr, Renn A. Holness, B.A., LL.B.

Questions to Ask a Personal Injury Lawyer Before Hiring- ICBC Car Accident Claims

December 16th, 2012

As a personal injury lawyer in British Columbia since 1995 I have been interviewed countless times by car accident claimants  looking to choose the right lawyer. An injury claimant confessed to me recently that he needed legal help but did not know what questions to ask  before he hired a personal injury lawyer.  Today I want to address, from my own personal view, three important  inquiries to make before hiring a personal injury lawyer. When trying to find a personal injury lawyer here are three important questions to ask:

Question #1- Are you a member in good standing with the Law Society of British Columbia?

All personal injury lawyers in BC are regulated by the Law Society of BC to  protect the public by setting and enforcing standards of professional conduct for lawyers. You can always contact the Law Society directly to confirm whether the lawyer is able to practice in British Columbia.

Question #2- Do you have any experience representing car accident claimants against ICBC (the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia)?

Remember that most BC drivers that are at fault are insured with ICBC so ICBC is the insurance company for the other driver and has a duty to defend that driver against your legal injury claim. Furthermore you, the injury claimant, may also have “no-fault” accident benefits with ICBC. Try to hire a lawyer that only works on personal injury including ICBC injury claim matters as they are best able to keep up to date on the daily changes in the law and have often acquired an in depth understanding of the subject matter.

Question #3- Are there any restrictions in your ability as a lawyer to represent me against ICBC in a personal injury claim?

Some lawyers that work for ICBC have signed agreements with ICBC preventing them from suing ICBC for bad faith. In fact under this agreement ICBC can fire the lawyer if he or she makes a prohibited claim against ICBC on behalf of the claimant. Ask the lawyer whether he or she has signed a “strategic alliance agreement” with ICBC and if so avoid hiring that lawyer if you intend on claiming against ICBC for bad faith or hope to get punitive damage compensation from ICBC.

There are also other questions you may want to ask a personal injury lawyer when choosing a lawyer. Ultimately, select a lawyer that you have confidence in as you will need to be able to accept the lawyer’s advice.

Posted by Mr. Renn A. Holness, B.A. LL.B.